Politics of memory

Poles are proud of their history

Data 2016-12-23
Most Poles consider themselves to be patriots and say there's nothing to be ashamed of in Poland's history.

 

ARE YOU INTERESTED IN HISTORY?

Key points

Only one in three Poles is interested in history. Twenty per cent of respondents say they are very interested in history, 43 per cent rate their interest as average. These results have not changed significantly in 30 years, although in 2006, the number of those interested in history rose to 75 per cent, and then fell. Three-quarters of Poles believe knowledge about the past is necessary today (-10 percentage points since 1987). For 33 per cent, knowledge of history is an important element of education and refinement (+2 points since 1987), for one in six respondents it is the basis of identity and national consciousness (+9 points since 1987). Three-quarters know that Poland regained independence on November 11, 1918.

Poles proud of their history. Four out of five respondents believe that Poles can be proud of both historical figures and events (no major change since 1987). According to one in five, there have been figures in Poland's history that brought shame to the country (-13 points since 1987), and one in four thinks can also point to shameful events (-8 per cent). Almost two-thirds of those polled also say that there are things in Poland today that they are ashamed of - the number has fallen by as much as 15 points since 2003, though. At the same time, the number of people who think that Poland is better country that most others has increased visibly (55 per cent, +22 points since 2003).

WHO ARE YOU MOST PROUD OF?

John Paul II the biggest source of pride. Almost half of all respondents (46 per cent) named Karol Wojtyła as the figure they are proud of (+35 points since 1987), John Paul II also came first in a ranking carried out in 2003 (43 per cent). Lech Wałęsa is second (20 per cent, not named in 1987), followed closely by Piłsudski (19 per cent, +6 points). In 1987, Poles tended to name heroes from Poland's history before the 20th century (Tadeusz Kościuszko, Władysław Jagiełło or Copernicus). Not many respondents named figures that Poles should be ashamed of - Wojciech Jaruzelski topped the list (4 per cent), which in previous studies was headed by Edward Gierek (8 per cent, 1987) and Lech Wałęsa (9 per cent, 2003), with the latter also taking third place in the pride ranking.

WHICH EVENTS MAKE YOU PROUD?

Poles are not usually ashamed. The events which Poles take the most pride in are: the choice of Wojtyła as Pope (19 per cent, +16 points since 1987), the political and economic transformation (18 per cent) and regaining independence (14 per cent, +8 points). One in 10 respondents named the Battle of Grunwald and the Warsaw Uprising. In previous studies, the Battle of Grunwald (26 per cent in 1987) and the transformation (19 per cent in 2003) headed the list. Poles are reluctant to recall embarrassing events in history. This year, the most frequently named were the Jedwabne pogrom (4 per cent) and martial law (3 per cent). In 1987 Poles were most ashamed of the partitions (9 per cent) and in 2003 - martial law (8 per cent).

Poles consider themselves patriots. As many as 88 per cent of those polled see themselves as patriots (according to CBOS in 2016), three quarters are proud of being Polish. Respondents believe that patriotism means showing respect to the emblem, flag and the national anthem (answer given by 94 per cent), passing down national values in the family (92 per cent) and looking after historical monuments (91 per cent). Most Poles also believe that being a patriot involves taking part in elections (88 per cent), buying Polish products (80 per cent) and paying taxes (72 per cent). Of those polled, 52 per cent own a red and white flag.

WHAT'S NEXT

Poles are proud of their past and only ashamed of a few events. This shows PiS's strength in the symbolical sphere - respondents support Jarosław Kaczyński, who accuses his opponents of propagating the so-called pedagogy of shame. Historical policy is one of PiS's key areas of activity, the party puts emphasis on spreading national values in public media, fights for the good name of Poland abroad and tries to influence contents conveyed by museums. The opposition is also beginning to appreciate the power of historical policy, and giving it more and more space in its programmes.

Source: TNS Polska study for the National Centre for Culture, July 2016, sample of 1512 people.

Write to author
Joanna Sawicka
Senior Analyst for Political Affairs
Joanna Sawicka
PI Alert
10:00
28.06.2024

EU summit: Member States launch discussion on financing joint defence initiatives

State of play

Leaders approved appointments to top posts. At the EU summit that ended on Thursday night, they nominated Ursula von der Leyen for a second term as head of EurCom, former Portuguese Prime Minister António Costa as head of EurCou and Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as head of EU diplomacy. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni abstained from voting for von der Leyen and voted against Costa and Kallas. This means that Meloni is preparing for tough negotiations and may demand a high political price in return for his party's support for von der Leyen in her approval in the EurParl. Prime Minister Viktor Orbán voted against von der Leyen and abstained on Kallas.

They adopted the Union's strategic agenda for 2024-2029. Over the next five years, the Union's goals include a successful digital and green transformation by "pragmatically" pursuing the path to climate neutrality by 2050. Another objective is to strengthen the EU's security and defence capabilities.

Von der Leyen spoke of EUR 500 billion for defence over a decade. This was the EurCom estimate of needed EU investment presented by its head at the EurCou meeting. Poland and France were among the countries that expected the EurCom to present possible options for financing defence investments before the summit, such as EU financing of common expenditure from a common borrowing. This idea was strongly opposed by Germany and the Netherlands, among others. In the end, von der Leyen decided to postpone the debate until after the constitution of the new EurCom, i.e. in the autumn. And the summit - after von der Leyen's oral presentation - only launched a preliminary debate on possible joint financing of defence projects.

Poland has submitted two defence projects. These might be co-financed by EU funds. On the eve of the summit, Poland and Greece presented in writing a detailed concept for an air defence system for the Union (Shield and Spear), which Prime Ministers Donald Tusk and Kyriakos Mitostakis had put forward - in a more general form - in May. In addition, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia presented the idea of jointly strengthening the defence infrastructure along the EU's borders with Russia and Belarus. Poland is pushing for the EU to go significantly beyond its current plans to support the defence industry with EU funds and agree to spend money on defence projects similar to the two proposals. But EU states are far from a consensus on the issue.

Zelensky signed a security agreement with the Union. The document, signed by President Volodymyr Zelensky in Brussels, commits all member states and the EU as a whole to "help Ukraine defend itself, resist efforts to destabilise it and deter future acts of aggression". The document recalls the EUR 5 billion the EU intends to allocate for military aid and training in 2024 (in addition to bilateral aid from EU countries to Kyiv). It says that "further comparable annual increases could be envisaged until 2027, based on Ukrainian needs" i.e. it could amount to up to EUR 20 billion. Ukraine's agreement with the EU comes on top of the bilateral security "guarantees" Ukraine has already signed with a dozen countries (including the US, UK, Germany, France, Italy). As Prime Minister Donald Tusk confirmed in Brussels, talks are also underway between Ukraine and Poland on the text of mutual commitments on security issues.

PI Alert
21:00
09.06.2024

KO wins elections to the European Parliament

KO received 38.2 per cent of the vote and PiS 33.9 per cent, according to an exit poll by IPSOS. Konfederacja came in third with 11.9 per cent, followed by Trzecia Droga with 8.2 per cent, Lewica with 6.6 per cent, Bezpartyjni Samorządowcy with 0.8 per cent and Polexit with 0.3 per cent. According to the exit poll, KO gained 21 seats, PiS 19, Konfederacja 6, Trzecia Droga 4 and Lewica gained 3. The turnout was 39.7 per cent.

According to the European Parliament's first projection, the centre-right European People's Party (EPP), which includes, among others, PO and PSL, will remain the largest force with 181 MEPs in the 720-seat Parliament. The centre-left Socialists and Democrats (S&D), whose members include the Polish Lewica, should have 135 seats, whereas the liberal Renew Europe club (including Polska 2050) will have 82 seats. This gives a total of 398 seats to the coalition of these three centrist factions (EPP, S&D and Renew Europe) on which the European Commission under Ursula von der Leyen has relied on so far. The Green faction wins 53 seats according to the same projection, the European Conservatives and Reformists faction (including PiS) 71 seats and the radical right-wing Identity and Democracy 62 seats.

Publications
Publications
Publications